<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LightBeam &#8211; measuring performance of Swing look-and-feels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347</link>
	<description>Leaving no pixel behind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:02:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill Grouchnikov</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347&#038;cpage=1#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill Grouchnikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>Luke - you beat me to the follow-up post :) Please see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=348&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;next post&lt;/a&gt; for the numbers for different core Substance skins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke &#8211; you beat me to the follow-up post :) Please see the <a href="http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=348" rel="nofollow">next post</a> for the numbers for different core Substance skins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Sleeman</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347&#038;cpage=1#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Sleeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>This is great!  One thing we noticed with substance is the skin you were using has a dramatic effect on the speed.  Things like watermarks and button shapers in particular had a big effect.  Do you have any numbers comparing different substance themes?  Under version 5 is there still much of a difference between different themes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great!  One thing we noticed with substance is the skin you were using has a dramatic effect on the speed.  Things like watermarks and button shapers in particular had a big effect.  Do you have any numbers comparing different substance themes?  Under version 5 is there still much of a difference between different themes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill Grouchnikov</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347&#038;cpage=1#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill Grouchnikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>Maxim - i&#039;ve changed the link to PDF format.

Thierry - yes, Substance 5.0dev is about 2.5-3.5 faster than the previous release. I&#039;ve written about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=342&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Java2D techniques&lt;/a&gt; that i used for tuning the performance.

Andrew - Synthetica is already on the list. JTattoo Aero is 3,494 ms.

Thanks
Kirill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxim &#8211; i&#8217;ve changed the link to PDF format.</p>
<p>Thierry &#8211; yes, Substance 5.0dev is about 2.5-3.5 faster than the previous release. I&#8217;ve written about <a href="http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=342" rel="nofollow">Java2D techniques</a> that i used for tuning the performance.</p>
<p>Andrew &#8211; Synthetica is already on the list. JTattoo Aero is 3,494 ms.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Kirill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew McVeigh</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347&#038;cpage=1#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew McVeigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>any chance of measuring jtattoo and synthetica?

Cheers,
Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any chance of measuring jtattoo and synthetica?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry Janaudy</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347&#038;cpage=1#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry Janaudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>Hello,

This is great. I am right in reading this: Substance 5 is 3 times faster than version 4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>This is great. I am right in reading this: Substance 5 is 3 times faster than version 4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxim</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347&#038;cpage=1#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=347#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>Hi Kirill,

Interesting comparison. Unfortunately I can&#039;t open xlsx. Could you please publish the performance spreadsheet in some more wide usable format like PDF?

Thanks,
Maxim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kirill,</p>
<p>Interesting comparison. Unfortunately I can&#8217;t open xlsx. Could you please publish the performance spreadsheet in some more wide usable format like PDF?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Maxim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
