<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Substance 5.1 &#8211; polishing the Office Blue skin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056</link>
	<description>Leaving no pixel behind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:02:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swing links of the week, January 18th &#124; Jonathan Giles</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056&#038;cpage=1#comment-9073</link>
		<dc:creator>Swing links of the week, January 18th &#124; Jonathan Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056#comment-9073</guid>
		<description>[...] improving his flamingo JRibbon and substance projects, bringing the flamingo look and feel much closer to that of Office 2007. Behind the scenes on the mailing lists he and Andrey Eremchenko have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] improving his flamingo JRibbon and substance projects, bringing the flamingo look and feel much closer to that of Office 2007. Behind the scenes on the mailing lists he and Andrey Eremchenko have been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith W</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056&#038;cpage=1#comment-9054</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056#comment-9054</guid>
		<description>Hi Kirill,

This looks great.

About Jitterbug, it&#039;s a cool name for a cool program. Have you ever tried dancing jitterbug or swing?! I recently did some classes.

By the way, the javafx dev who goes by the alias of aNt has said that the trust dialogs of javafx (and hopefully other programs??) are being addressed. See this thread:
http://www.javagaming.org/index.php/topic,19589.msg156725.html#msg156725

Best regards,
Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kirill,</p>
<p>This looks great.</p>
<p>About Jitterbug, it&#8217;s a cool name for a cool program. Have you ever tried dancing jitterbug or swing?! I recently did some classes.</p>
<p>By the way, the javafx dev who goes by the alias of aNt has said that the trust dialogs of javafx (and hopefully other programs??) are being addressed. See this thread:<br />
<a href="http://www.javagaming.org/index.php/topic,19589.msg156725.html#msg156725" rel="nofollow">http://www.javagaming.org/index.php/topic,19589.msg156725.html#msg156725</a></p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sakuraba</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056&#038;cpage=1#comment-9048</link>
		<dc:creator>Sakuraba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056#comment-9048</guid>
		<description>Insanely great work! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insanely great work! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056&#038;cpage=1#comment-9047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056#comment-9047</guid>
		<description>excellent work.  the subtlety might be maddening to implement, but the overall impression and professionalism improves dramatically.  even as a server-side coder this makes me want to write a client-side app :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent work.  the subtlety might be maddening to implement, but the overall impression and professionalism improves dramatically.  even as a server-side coder this makes me want to write a client-side app :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill Grouchnikov</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056&#038;cpage=1#comment-9046</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill Grouchnikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056#comment-9046</guid>
		<description>Pedro,

There are certain limitations in what can be done for the band rollover effects so that it looks good across all Substance skins. This is certainly one area for improvement.

Not sure about the borders - are you talking about the corner radius, colors or something else? The only big point that i can see is the corner radius of the bottom corners of selected task button. In Flamingo they are not round at all (for now). 

Thanks
Kirill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedro,</p>
<p>There are certain limitations in what can be done for the band rollover effects so that it looks good across all Substance skins. This is certainly one area for improvement.</p>
<p>Not sure about the borders &#8211; are you talking about the corner radius, colors or something else? The only big point that i can see is the corner radius of the bottom corners of selected task button. In Flamingo they are not round at all (for now). </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Kirill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Duque Vieira</title>
		<link>http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056&#038;cpage=1#comment-9044</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Duque Vieira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=1056#comment-9044</guid>
		<description>Hi Kirill,

Two things I think are missing:
- You can barely see the rollover effect over the active band. In office2007 this is much more noticeable.

- In office 2007 borders are smoother: tab borders, band borders

That&#039;s just my personal opinion. The main thing to point out is that it looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kirill,</p>
<p>Two things I think are missing:<br />
- You can barely see the rollover effect over the active band. In office2007 this is much more noticeable.</p>
<p>- In office 2007 borders are smoother: tab borders, band borders</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my personal opinion. The main thing to point out is that it looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
